Why Men Prefer Waxed Hollywood Women

From "I want to get off ".... The farewell of

25 gennaio 2009, in Marco Travaglio
Tutto quello che leggete è falso

Nell’ottobre ‘96, having to justify their voters the mess of the Bicameral , right and left took to the good hoax "cimicione" Berlusconi said that he found in his study and attributed to "attorney diverted." Then it was discovered that he was a useless old crap , placed in his home by a friend of his security chief in charge of "reclaim" the palace. But meanwhile, was born and the Bicameral cimicione scam had done its dirty function. Now Al Tappone tries again with another superball, seconded by the usual supposed opposition and newspapers: the alleged "scandal" of the 'archive Genchi " , which should pave the way for the counter of interceptions. Gioacchino Genchi is a police officer, on leave for years, working with the judiciary since the time of Falcon, has shed light on the massacres of the Mafia, has solved dozens of unsolved murders and still cooperate with prosecutors in various investigations malaffari, mafioserie and acts of violence. What makes Jenkins: listens? No, nobody has ever intercepted. So, whatever you want to support its activities, has no connection with the anti-wiretapping . What does then Genchi? The magistrates, by law, have intercepts and acquisition of phone records. Then they go to the expert, who will "cross" thanks to sophisticated software and reports on intercepted telephone conversations between suspects and defendants. Jenkins has made the investigation of De Magistris, before they were snatched away to the holder. All figures should be read in the newspapers and comments by politicians (including President of the ineffable Copasir Francesco Rutelli, a friend of the suspect No. 1 of "Why Not" Antonio Saladino ) are false or handled or the result of gross ignorance. Who is scandalized by the "thousands of telephones monitored on behalf of De Magistris, who screams between those numbers because we are, "not many suspects" to parliament not intercepted, secret agents, not know what he says . Or consciously lies. On behalf of De Magistris, Jenkins has dealt with 730 users, belonging to a much smaller number of people (each using multiple phones and multiple cards): among these there are dozens of suspects and hundreds of non-suspects. Inevitably, as the tabulations indicate who calls whom, who is called by whom, and where and at what time, but not the content of the conversation. And each suspect speaks with dozens of suspects not . Nobody knows who these people (ladies? agenti segreti? papi?), finchè non si risale al titolare dell’utenza. Solo dopo, se l’utente è coperto da immunità o altri privilegi, si provvede a fermarsi o a chiedere il permesso. In ogni caso è impossibile violare segreti di Stato leggendo il tabulato di una spia (non si sa cosa dice), né intercettandola: la legge vieta a militari e agenti segreti di “trattare al telefono argomenti classificati”. Se uno 007 parla al telefono di segreti di Stato, è lui a violare la legge, non chi lo ascolta .
(Vignetta di Natangelo )